Posted on 12/04/2012 6:20:01 PM PST by Morgana
Meet Corey Curtis.
The Wisconsin man, who has fathered nine children with six women, was ordered yesterday to cease procreating until he can support his numerous offspring.
At Curtiss sentencing yesterday for bail jumping and failure to pay child support, Circuit Court Judge Tim Boyle told the 44-year-old Racine man that his frequent breeding was to be curbed as a condition of his three-year probation term.
(Excerpt) Read more at thesmokinggun.com ...
The comments after the article are really good.
Is he getting conjugal visits privileges?
The feminist movement sure has benefited women.
He is not a deadbeat dad.
If a woman is the sole arbiter of life or death of an unborn baby and they aren’t married then the woman is solely responsible for her decision and there is no lawful or unconscionable action of obligation on the part of the man.
See how I turn the woman’s inviolable right into their sole obligation and responsibility for its outcome?
If anyone thinks this is a solution to the problem, they need to have there head examined. It’s just a way to make certain people feel better, because real solutions to the problems would be unpopular. And it’s allowing the government powers that they will misuse very soon. I know there are conservatives who are deluded into thinking this is a good idea, but they are going to nasty surprise. If you want to steal leftwing ideas, stop calling yourself a conservative.
No WELFARE after kid #3....
And that goes for the guy, too!
It is a crime to wilfully fail and refuse to provide support for one's children. Most people don't see that rule as being contrary to conservative principles.
This fellow has been found guilty of that crime. He could be sentenced to prison. The judge has told him in substance that if he promises to quit impregnating women, the judge will not sentence him to prison for the crime he committed. The fellow here has to make a choice. He can choose prison or choose to promise to stop impregnating women during the term of his probation.
You are right about more effective solutions, but forced sterilization is probably not constitutional.
The bipartisan, libertine, political/regulator class doesn’t want to return to what worked the best for thousands of years. They would rather go from one pagan/secular experiment to another. In spite of what they are being shown, they continue in their vanities and display increasingly more hatred against the relatively innocent. So we each try to survive what is happening and what is probably to come.
How much does the state pay these women?
The government subsidizes and enables single slum motherhood and then tells this guy *he* should exercise more self control?
The problem would resolve itself if the state would stop itself from procreating. The legs er doors would slam shut to this wandering willie in no time flat.
This problem has been going on for a long time. We have been complaining about it for decades.
I remember one story years ago where a state tried to force a welfare (Amish) mom to take birth control after her second or third? child. In the photo the Amish woman was holding the birth control pills and frowning with that attitude that this was somehow infringing on her “rights”.
It was “blame the woman” because before women started acting like men, sexually, they were the gatekeepers - you know it, I know it, and everyone knows it - and they had standards and said “give me a ring first, THEN we’ll tango”.
Now women have been lied to for 50 years about free love, sexual liberation and “equality” and all it’s got them is being whores, stds, men who don’t want to marry them because they sleep around so casually, 50+ million abortions and a country where more kids grow up without a dad.
The sexual revolution has made everyone casualties and more suspicious and uncertain than ever.
Enforcing it may get easier. Obama just nominated this guy to a vacant U.S. District court in Eastern Pennsylvania.
From http://abclocal.go.com/wpvi/story?section=news/local&id=6930987
READING, Pa. (AP) - July 24, 2009 — The American Civil Liberties Union is asking the state Supreme Court to release 18 central Pennsylvania inmates sentenced to jail without attorneys present in court.
ACLU of Pennsylvania attorney Mary Catherine Roper filed the petition Thursday. She says the 18 didn’t have attorneys when sentenced to Berks County Prison for failure to pay child support.
The ACLU learned of the cases when contacted by 45-year-old Cesar Cepeda Jr., sentenced by Judge Timothy Rowley in July 2008 to 15 months in jail.
The ACLU says President Judge Jeffrey Schmehl has said all 18 inmates will get new hearings with attorneys present, but he has refused to release them in the meantime.
Why would any woman go with him? Did you see the picture?
“Now women have been lied to for 50 years about free love, sexual liberation and equality and all its got them is being whores, stds, men who dont want to marry them because they sleep around so casually, 50+ million abortions and a country where more kids grow up without a dad.”
********************************
Now women AND MEN have been lied to for 50 years about free love, sexual liberation and equality ...
There fixed it for you!
You forgot to blame Kinsey for the lies in the form of so called research and education.
Might I also add that because of Kinsey some of them grow up without a mom.
In fact let me back up that “and men” with facts.
Yesterday I spent the day listening to some interviews with Dr. Judith Reisman. (I’m sure all you FReepers know who she is). She said some things I had not heard before. One was on Hugh Heffner. I knew it was because of Kinsey that Heffner started “Playboy”. What I did not know was that while in college Hefffer and other men like him often remained a virgin till married and Heffner was in fact a virgin until he read Kinsey’s report! I never knew both those facts.
I have to wonder what kind of person Hugh Heffner would have become had Kinsey’s report would have never made light. Same for Larry the Flint.
You say women were the “gatekeepers”? According to Dr. Reisman at one time it was illegal to whisper “sweet nothings” in a girls ear and try to seduce her! Don’t believe me? Go on youtube and listen to all her interviews! I had never heard that either. So at one time it was illegal to whisper “sweet nothings” now we have rap and other music about how some man wants to (in graphic language) do a woman!!!
Yes it does still take two to tango. Men should be pure as well as women. Thank you very much Dr. Reisman.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.