I’ve never read such a ridiculous and sophomoric news article.
The Times is quite literally “reporting” rumors in some cases and making up others. Then it just flat-out beats Romney with a stick putting into the article catch phrases that are totally unnecessary (his “CEO buddies...”).
This article shows that the Left is afraid that Romney will use his near-win to attack from outside of Washington. Something that he should consider.
Like him or not, he landed serious punches on Obama. A Romney untethered by Party could be beneficial.
Besides, Obama didn’t really win anything to brag about - what, his amazing economic and foreign policy plans got him re-elected??? C’mon. Even the vote count was awful close.
If Romney went on the attack and became a talking head (a la Palin) then he could really do some damage to an already fragile Administration.
One good debate did not a campaign make.
He essentially backed down most other places...except for his campaign ads..which is what he did in the primaries...using his ads to attack his competitors.
You know, when you go up vs. a boxer that doesn't even know how to duck, weave and bob vs. punches, your comment really doesn't say much.