Thanks for making my point. In your original post you stated another poster said that.
I made a comment to Finny about your straw man (not you) and you got butt hurt over it.
If you want to be pinged about a statement you made....have the intestinal fortitude to attribute the statement to yourself....don't create a straw man and get pissed off you weren't pinged over a statement about your imaginary friend.
Noo....more juvenile and hysterical BS from the both of you.
I seem to recall you getting hysterical because I called your straw man depraved. You also tried to falsely attribute my statements to "all Romney supporters." If you would've taken credit for YOUR statement I would have pinged you to ensure YOU understood I was talking about you.
Talk about trying to stir up trouble on a thread.....
I disagree with the premise. Republicans who continue to think that Romney would have been just fine, are not conservatives. It's not about courtesy pings and "hysteria," it's about identifying the lengths that folks are driven to go to justify Romney and thereby leaving him still in play.
The only things folks like Irish can do when challenged is to cite what Romney said. Actions speak more truly than words; in action, Romney has been a liberal Democrat. Republicans who can't perceive that aren't conservatives.
Whether you voted for him or not, agreeing that Romney is OUT and should always have been out is a bedrock issue, as far as I'm concerned. So soundly bedrock that it's looking like the only way to ditch the gangrene Romney symptomizes in the GOPe is to go third party. I don't like it any better than either of you, but facts is facts. Romneyitis has to be ditched.
But establishing groundrule principles is just too "hysterical" an undertaking, I guess.