Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: oldenuff2no
Someone peeing in class is a lot more disruptive than letting a kid leave to use the restroom. Stopping class so they can watch a kid dig through their desk for "bucks" for 5 minutes and then waiting for him/her to pee their pants. Then the class has to be evacuated and a cleaning done.

vs

Letting the kid get up and go.


I think the first instance is more disruptive.

This stupid program does not work. They have been doing this for 40 years apparently. It teaches kids to hate their schools and teachers with a seething hatred.

How do you think it feels being denied permission to pee when you really really have to go? You think they can help when they have to go?

There is nothing discipinary about this. Nothing.

46 posted on 12/02/2012 3:02:50 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: GeronL

Someone peeing in class is a lot more disruptive than letting a kid leave to use the restroom.

You are totally right. There is no way that rules this strict have been applied in this program for the last 40 years. That is the biggest clue as to just how inexperienced this teacher was. I can assure you that this was an incident that this teacher won’t forget and if she has any brains at all she learned a big lesson from it.

Thank you for making a constructive reply.


51 posted on 12/02/2012 3:42:28 PM PST by oldenuff2no
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson