You didn’t intend it that way, but this cartoon clearly mocks trickle-down economics by showing the rich guy upset that ‘lucky duck’ got a whole dollar, used to buy bargain food, out of the thousands the rich guy spent on luxuries.
A more accurate cartoon would be ‘lucky duck’ now working a full time job since ‘rich guy’ spent his $. An even better one would be to show the cyclical prosperity by having ‘lucky duck’ now able to buy a new car from Mr. richguy’s company.
Actually, I did intend it that way. ;)