Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Usagi_yo
Sounds like he talked too much.

Yes and No. The facts at the scene of the shooting raised questions that had to be answered. His answers to those questions were a bit much.

21 posted on 11/28/2012 8:06:41 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

Those questions did not have to be answered, al least not then. He should have simply admitted firing the shots and refused to say anything more until he obtained an attorney and consulted with that attorney. That’s particularly true here where he apparently fired multiple times after the threats apparently ended and killed both perps. In any case like that the the homeowner is at risk of some serious charges and needs to consult an attorney before saying anything to the cops.


28 posted on 11/28/2012 8:26:09 AM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip
The facts at the scene of the shooting raised questions that had to be answered.

A legitimate - and the only sensible - answer is: "If and when it comes to trial, my attorney will respond to that."

Regards,

62 posted on 11/28/2012 9:36:32 AM PST by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson