Why play the internet weirdo and start working on a long imaginative narrative about a shooting that you don’t know about yet, but are determined to try and pretend that what little we do know isn’t real, while your narratives are?
So far, the facts are that this guy killed a man, fired shots at a fleeing car, and then got his girlfriend and fled to a motel.
This guy is in some serious trouble.
So far, the facts are that this guy killed a man, fired shots at a fleeing car, and then got his girlfriend and fled to a motel.
This guy is in some serious trouble.
I am no more portraying an imaginary scenario than you are. There are at least two sides to this account. You are accepting one side because it was presented first.
You could as easily say some people pointed a shotgun at a man who responded with lethal force. They fled the scene and then concocted a story for the police. That is what the other side is saying. Should we believe one side over the other, because the side that lost the encounter went to the police first?
I agree, we do not know much about it yet, but you are certainly accepting a version of it. I am saying that there is at least one alternate version.