Sure, Mario, whatever.
So, do you agree with me that the COLB has no advantage over the letter of verification? If you want to question both on the same basis, I understand, but you haven’t given me any reason to trust one more than the other.
The problem with your position is that you want to decide a factual dispute on the internet with some documents rather than through a judicial hearing at which the rules of evidence would apply. The Certification of Live Birth, Certificate of Live Birth, or Letter of Verification is not sufficient to prove the date and place of birth if, despite admitting those documents into the record after satisfying the rules of evidence, there exists a material issue of fact in dispute regarding those factors. Should such a dispute exist, a plenary hearing is required at which all relevant and probative evidence may be presented and admitted into the record. After all evidence is so admitted, the trier of fact (either the jury or trial judge) can then decide the issues, applying the standard of proof each party may have. The parties will then have the procedural due process right to exhaust all available appeals of the decision. Once all appeals are exhausted, the matter will be finally adjudicated and whatever the final court determines regarding that factual dispute will have to be accepted.
P.S. Keep your little snarky introductions to yourself.