Please don’t be stupid enough to pull part of a quote from Minor and palm it off as a decision that supports your case. That makes you a liar, and a bad one.
“Hence, it really does not matter when defining an Article II “natural born Citizen” what Massachusetts called a person who became under that states naturalization laws a “citizen” after birth.”
Yes, it does - when it shows they considered NBC & NBS to be interchangeable terms. It leaves NO DOUBT about what the Founders (and ratifiers) thought was meant by NBC. It is the American version of the English common law meaning of natural born subject.
And since a NBS could have TWO alien parents, he could obviously have one. And if that was the meaning of NBS, then it is the meaning of NBC - according to original intent.
You just like to make stuff up, Mr. Rogers. You have no historical or case law support for your manufactured definition of a “natural born Citizen,” i.e., that it meant the same as a “natural born subject” under English common law. You just put together a piece here and a piece there, but your argument has no support in history, law, reason, and logic.
Only in forum land does NBS = nbC.
This lie is a lie. Repeating it will not make it true.