As opposed to argument ad nauseum? That's all I hear from the Birthers.(Not to mention argument from belittlement)
50 State Secretary's of State, The Electoral College votes Obama won, and the U.S Congress, and sworn in by the SCJSCOTUS and you're trying to convince us that they got it all wrong and are part of the conspiracy?
As I don't recall ever having discussed this with you, I cannot be held to account for what others have said. I know my own arguments are very good, as are the arguments of some others such as rxsid, and Spaulding, etc. Perhaps you should hear our arguments before taring us all with the same brush?
50 State Secretary's of State, The Electoral College votes Obama won, and the U.S Congress, and sworn in by the SCJSCOTUS and you're trying to convince us that they got it all wrong and are part of the conspiracy?
Incompetence does not a conspiracy make. In 225 years, how many times has the question of eligibility come up? Only 3 that I know of. That public officials should be so ignorant of History, Law, and their duty, does not at all strike me as hard to believe. The wonder is that they ever get any of it right.
Do you think "Anchor babies" were what any of the founders had in mind?