The clear wording of the Constitution has never stopped statists from bending, if not outright breaking it before, why would *this* be any different?
the infowarrior
>The clear wording of the Constitution has never stopped statists from bending, if not outright breaking it before, why would *this* be any different?
Good point; but it doesn’t mean that I can’t repudiate the “dissent is treason” thought here, does it?