Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: chimera
To win you have to be united

Succinct, and about as accurate as one can get.

Understood to the nth degree by the libs who currently own the senate and the presidency.

Understood by virtually every single politician who is currently holding office.

The flip side is what is used on the losers, by every winner, each and every time.

The entire purpose of each and every commercial, campaign stop, debate, or utterance is to separate the opponent from his voters.

The libs have it down to a science. They play that tune on a grand piano, every time, while conservatives argue about platforms, right up to the election, not realizing that THAT is exactly the sheet music the libs are playing from.

Want to argue about platform? Fine. Do so while picking candidates, stressing the positives of each. After the candidate is selected, by getting the mostest of the votes, then unite behind that candidate, or prepare to lose, one more time.

Regards candidates utterances, practice, practice and practice. If you cannot join words into a coherent sentence without stepping on your richard, then STFU.

A candidate must know, absolutely, that whatever comes out of their mouths is going to be twisted by the media to suit their goal (getting dems elected).

The media? The media is the actual democratic/liberal party. The liberal politicians are merely an extension of the media, the actual pawns, that get their hands dirty, for the masters.

Expecting any type of fairness or positive exposure from the media is same as grabbing a viper by the tail, then being surprised when it bites you. It is what they do>

Anything they say, write, publish, ask of you, or state, has but one purpose, to elect libs into office. Therefore, just like the admonition given by police, anything you say, anything, can and will be used against you in the court of public discourse, during the campaign and election.

Their MO for winning is to cause division, as they themselves have nothing to run on, as exemplified by this election. Yet, they won, again not because their guy was stellar (choke), but because our guy had the base divided into multiple fragments, by none other than the media. We lapped it up like a starving rescue kitten drinks a saucer of milk.

Not united, and at a loss, every time.

74 posted on 11/11/2012 8:32:01 AM PST by going hot (Happiness is a momma deuce)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: going hot

WOW!! I’ve missed your posts up until now. I agree with every word you say. Too bad, but these are the facts and our side can accept this or continue to lose elections. Frankly, I fear it is too late and we may never have a fair presidential election—ever, by peaceful means. Too many on our side surrendered too soon.


75 posted on 11/23/2012 8:47:26 AM PST by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson