Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dynachrome

She also went off on Boehner without checking the context. He is not for tax hikes - he is for some loop hole closing in exchange for lower rates - thats what he meant by revenues.

Now, as for his obama care statement - he is dead if he really said that.


3 posted on 11/08/2012 6:51:26 PM PST by C. Edmund Wright ("WFT: How Karl Rove and the Consultant Class Have Destroyed America")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: C. Edmund Wright

“She also went off on Boehner without checking the context. He is not for tax hikes - he is for some loop hole closing in exchange for lower rates - thats what he meant by revenues.”

Sounds like he’s still okay with giving the Beast more money when we should be starving the thing.


16 posted on 11/08/2012 7:04:51 PM PST by PLMerite (Shut the Beyotch Down! Burn, baby, burn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: C. Edmund Wright

If you advocate “New Revenues” by closing “Tax Loopholes” it is a tax increase. Your tax rate may remain the same, but if you remove deductions under the guise of closing “ loopholes” the result is that more tax is paid, hence a tax increase.


22 posted on 11/08/2012 7:16:25 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Never Underestimate the Power of Evil or Evil Doers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson