Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jessduntno

Romney was excellent in this campaign. He articulated a good conservative economic message. But, the reason he lost is because he did not make people feel like he cared enough about the needy and disadvantaged. That is the essence of compassion. Bush did it brilliantly. You can live in alternate reality. But, that won’t win national elections.


30 posted on 11/06/2012 10:31:59 PM PST by indianrightwinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: indianrightwinger

Romney was excellent in this campaign. He articulated a good conservative economic message. But, the reason he lost is because he did not make people feel like he cared enough about the needy and disadvantaged. That is the essence of compassion. Bush did it brilliantly. You can live in alternate reality. But, that won’t win national elections.


Romney gave 30 million last year alone to charity.

But you say he did not demonstrate feeling for his less fortunate fellow man.

No, he demonstrated it with his pocketbook, not with worthless words and clichés.

The unfortunate thing about is is that the typical voter is as ignorant of the facts as you.

Romney was not my choice, but he is so far better than obumbler that it is a national disgrace that he is in the oval office and a worse disgrace that he gets to spend the next four years there.


40 posted on 11/06/2012 10:42:23 PM PST by old curmudgeon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson