Exactly the opposite. This test got an unexpected result. Earlier tests indicated methane, and this test did not.
Did you even bother to read the article before tossing out your inane knee-jerk comment? And which "anointed ones" do you refer to? And which wastes of money were you referring to? (Like maybe those scientific advances that made it possible for you to type your mistaken indignation to the world within seconds, perhaps?)
This test got an unexpected result. Earlier tests indicated methane, and this test did not.
So to prove it conclusively, the results of the best 57 out of 113 tests should be considered the absolutely correct test result.
I should hope that for that amount of money and time that they also proved that there was no (list of all the periodic table of elements).