To: sirchtruth
His statement seems nonsensical. If you're watching and listening to an attack in real time, why would you ask to find out what happened? In the same way, why would you ask who the perpetrators are if they're currently engaged (go capture or kill them and you can probably find out)? He speaks as though the event was in progress, but some of the orders he claims to have issued are in the past tense. Maybe he would have an out in that “what happened” could refer to events leading to the attack, and the “who” is the organization behind the attack. Still, seems to me, he's just another lying lawyer like Clinton, but not as gifted. Also, I thought Ham said nobody asked him to send help. So either Obama’s lying, Ham's lying, somebody didn't relay the order, or somebody interpreted “secure the people” to mean “watch”.
4 posted on
10/29/2012 7:16:16 AM PDT by
throwback
(The object of opening the mind, is as of opening the mouth, is to shut it again on something solid.)
To: throwback
So either Obamas lying...Obama is not only lying he is an INCOMPETENT POS at his very best!
Blaming the video alone is just ONE of his lies!
5 posted on
10/30/2012 4:06:36 AM PDT by
sirchtruth
(Freedom is not free.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson