[Altariel]

There is a legal distinction between a domesticated and a wild animal. You are ignoring it because it undermines your fallacious argument.

[Dr. Sivana]

There is a legal distinction between a domesticated and a wild animal.

Once you concede that the law can distinguish between legal and illegal animals, you also concede that the law can determine which supposedly domestic animals are too dangerous to breed. The problem isn't just wild vs. domestic. The REASON to control (not necessarily outlaw) ownership of wild animals is because they are DANGEROUS. The same motivation can be used in BSL.

This law has been in place now for 20 years. The breeder should be charged. How dare that breeder breed a dangerous, illegal breed, KNOWING that he is putting the puppies' lives in danger?