Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: PieterCasparzen

” - - - The refusal to bring security to standard recommended levels all year is a telltale sign to me.”

That is the most solid observation about Benghazi.

As yet, it cannot reconciled to anything yet proposed by the Obama Regime.

BTW, what if Obama was trading small arms in exchange for some of the missing Libyan Missiles?

If that is true, then the 4 murdered Americans in Benghazi could have been killed with arms and ammunition supplied to them by “Fast and Furious” Obama.


7 posted on 10/26/2012 12:49:20 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: Graewoulf

No need, there’s funding for the Arab spring projects since they are official and even public. Everyone knows the weapons are going to Syria, Russia is bothered by this and is solidifying their defense of Syria. The U.S. operations are public knowledge, though the U.S. government officially keeps out of the Syrian “revolution”. This way the U.S. and Russia don’t have to be officially, public irate with each other and just let their proxies fight it out. I just don’t see much with arms, Syria, Russia or Iran going on there.

The theory of a Soros-backed October surprise for the election is the most plausible to me at this point.

A) Soros has a history of spending billions on political activism around the world; it would fit his pattern, cost him very little and be very easy for his network.

B) He was instrumental in the 2004 Gore campaign; he has an admitted serious interest in American politics

C) Much of this administration has deep connections to NGOs in general and Soros network in particular. Hillary and Soros have great mutual respect for each other, and the Obama administration has appeared to be in lock-step with the Arab spring, which Soros is very much in line with. The Soros network has been very helpful in partnering with the U.S. government, so he could communicate with the highest levels of the administration as necessary.

D) Soros would have had the sense to start planning well over a year ago and he is thoroughly connected with not only the U.S. government but also the “rebels”; his network is a big part of the Arab spring.

E) Only simple messages would need to be relayed: to the U.S. government politicians, just clear out security, and should something happen, just wait and all will work out well. To the rebels, I’ll get security cleared out and get the Ambassador there on 9/11, just grab him alive, do the hostage routine, and agree to a release prior to the election after allowing Obama to be the hero. It would be very simple, not involve anyone in the administration very much and the rebels would scatter when the operation was complete. I see it all part of Obama’s walking the tightrope, holding back and messing up America while trying to appear as much as possible to Americans like he is really trying to help America, and letting the muslim world have free rein as much as he can as pResident. Not very difficult, does not require much coordination or even communication, just doubletalk and a complicit news media.


9 posted on 10/26/2012 1:28:51 PM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson