Armstrong is such a megalomaniac liar that it's almost surreal to imagine anyone would take it to the extent that he has, therefore he must be innocent. Obama does this too.
Interesting caveats now beginning to emerge, however. UCI insist that nothing in the USADA report implicated Hein Verbruggen in any wrong doing and that the UCI, although convinced by the testimonies relating to the Armstrong Tour winning years, doesn't regard the Armstrong tests in his comeback years (2009-10) as positive.
Well, that's all I've been claiming, but it does show that part of the USADA report in a bad light.
I feel vindicated. :-)