Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
An accused should have the right (does have the right) to face and examine the accusers.

He did. Armstrong had the opportunity to take the case to arbitration but he declined.

Ask yourself WHY??? It's not for lack of money which he has plenty of -- a little less now.

112 posted on 10/22/2012 2:21:00 PM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip

He has said why many times - he is just sick of the circus, and just wants it to end.
Silence does not mean guilt.


113 posted on 10/22/2012 2:29:42 PM PDT by svcw (Why is one cell on another planet considered life, and in the womb it is not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

To: Uncle Chip

did you see the criteria for the joke of a hearing?

NO right to see evidence.
No right to examine the accusers before trial
No right to examine or challenge the methods of obtaining the evidence.

That was no a tria or a hearing, it was just a reading of the verdict with a chance to read a meaningless response post sentence.

Even a 100% guilty murderer had more of an opportunity for trial.


124 posted on 10/22/2012 4:23:57 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson