Hello? What’s the darn report about, then?
“A report” is not a trial.
An accused should have the right (does have the right) to face and examine the accusers. To examine their SCIENTIFIC basis for their accusations.
mere blah blah is not enough. then it is just he said vs he said.
What about the personal vendettas?
If armstrong and his lawyers can’t take that appart then the accusation stands. If the accusation can’t stand the light of examination then it should and must fail.
With a few dollars and personal vendettas ANYONE can be smeared with anything.