“You’ve been programmed to assume guilt when you see the words “pot bust”, without even knowing if there was any pot. “
No, I have not, I have said repeatedly the man may be innocent and is entitled to his day in court. I am aware that innocent people are sometimes raided, and sometimes arrested.
Have you been programmed to hear “cop shoots dog” and immediately assume the cop is an evil thug?
You have also said repeatedly that he's responsible for endangering his dogs by running a pot growing operation. How do you do that without something suppressing the mechanism that should be telling you that both of those statements cannot simultaneously be true?