“It’s like blaming the victim of a mugging for being mugged or blaming the victim of rape for being rape and insisting that the victim must have done *something* for the criminal(s) to commit aforesaid crime against them.”
No. The victims in this case are the dogs. I don’t blame them one whit.
The man is also a victim, unless you have substantive evidence he is guilty a crime.
How are you coming on that?