So you are blaming the victim of an assault by government employees instead of blaming the government employees who shot the dogs? The dogs would have been in zero danger had the cops acted like peace officers instead of blood-thirsty orcs.
Not one shred of evidence has been produced that there was pot at the residence.
What next? Will it be acceptable for cops to shoot children they find at a residence when they conduct a “pot bust”? How about the elderly? Pregnant women?
By the way, bear in mind that several of the Founding Fathers grew hemp on their property. Would modern day cops have been justified to slaughter dogs and slaves they found on the plantation simply because it is known that Washington (and others) grew the plant?
“Not one shred of evidence has been produced that there was pot at the residence.”
I don’t know about that. Of course I don’t support an illegitimate raid. The story does not give that info.
I am making the larger point that an dog owner should not be surprised something bad happens to his dogs if he deliberately endangers them. Walk him along the railroad tracks, and then get surprised they get hit.