Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Native Born vs. Natural Born (vanity)

Posted on 10/19/2012 11:59:50 AM PDT by NTHockey

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last
To: Larry - Moe and Curly
Can you imagine the listening audience he’d have with that subject, a civil discussion and callers such as DiogenesLamp, Mario Apuzo and Leo Donofrio?

Yes. His regular audience + 3 more. That is until the birthers began speaking at which point half his audience would change the channel.

121 posted on 10/21/2012 9:05:13 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1
rather than on your own personal opinion about what the world should be

That's rich. "What the world should be" is literally the motto of birtherism. The United States of America has no legal mechanism to enforce the birther interpretation of natural born. The world is what the world is.

122 posted on 10/21/2012 9:15:21 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Drew68; douginthearmy

Do you have anything serious that you can add to this discussion or do you think that your little jokes take the place of any intelligent argument on your part?


123 posted on 10/21/2012 9:18:54 PM PDT by Puzo1 (Ask the Right Questions to Get the Right Answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

I must tell you that “What the world should be” is your position, not that of the “Birthers.”


124 posted on 10/21/2012 9:22:21 PM PDT by Puzo1 (Ask the Right Questions to Get the Right Answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

You are the 1%x10^-6


125 posted on 10/21/2012 11:04:50 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1
Do you have anything serious that you can add

Yes. But I am not going to reply after I make it. I know before I even press submit that no matter what I say, there will be pages of horse-pucky explaining why I am a fools fool who should flog himself with a stupid stick.

Firstly, there have been countless legitimate arguments made against birthers on countless threads. Most reasonable FReepers won't come near these threads with a 10' pole anymore, because they know birthers are nuts. I know you guys like to believe that you are reasonable, but any objective observation of birther threads will show that birthers are intollerant of disbelief in the cult of Vattel.

Since you guys are all smarter than the rest of us, riddle me this...

Stools have legs and stools have seats and any fool knows a stool has 3 or more legs but only one seat. But the birther, when presented with seats of stools and legs of stools, flipped the logic of the world on its end and sat not upon the seat but on the leg, and not once, or twice but thrice for all to see. And who said that "in order to be of the country, it is necessary that a person be born of a father who is a citizen"? Surely not so wise a man as one who would say "of parents who are citizens". Stools which have seats and seats of stools, why I tell you its all nonesense! Every birther knows a stool has two legs and two seats!

How do you presume to apply equal protection under the law given the United States government does not track the citizenship of either parent nonetheless "both" at the time of birth for millions of Americans? No birther wants to have an "intelligent argument" as you put it. Birthers are no different than liberals who claim the 2nd amendment only protects militias.

126 posted on 10/21/2012 11:43:38 PM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: NTHockey
He argued that since I was born here that I was born here that I was natural.

He was right. Birth on US soil confers 14th Amendment citizenship (unless your parents have diplomatic immunity and are thus not "subject to the jurisdiction"). And, if you are entitled to be a citizen by reason of birth (via the 14th Amendment or otherwise), you are automatically a natural born citizen for purposes of presidential eligibility.

But you still have to run and get elected, of course.

With regard to the last point, the Sheeple made a massive, but entirely Constitutional, mistake in 2008. It will soon be corrected, nattering about 18th century Swiss legal scholars notwithstanding. And then it will be forgotten!

127 posted on 10/22/2012 12:13:39 AM PDT by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sten

They have purposely created the ignorance by first infiltrating our schools. The Weather Underground temporarily gave up bombs for books. It worked. Pray.


128 posted on 10/22/2012 4:49:41 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: djf

Of course, and anyone who does not understand that does not have a lick of common sense nor the ability to appreciate the common sense of our founding fathers. Idiots.


129 posted on 10/22/2012 4:53:30 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

It is clear to me that you do not have the ability to speak informatively on the issue of what is a “natural born Citizen.” You are on here just throwing around little sound bites. I will not waste my time with you.


130 posted on 10/22/2012 5:00:45 AM PDT by Puzo1 (Ask the Right Questions to Get the Right Answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

Comment #131 Removed by Moderator

To: douginthearmy

“That is until the birthers...”

There you go again, Doug.


132 posted on 10/22/2012 5:45:08 AM PDT by Larry - Moe and Curly (Loose lips sink ships.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Larry - Moe and Curly
Larry - Moe and Curly to douginthearmy. You are practicing Saul Alinsky’s Rules for Radicals, rule 5 and rule 10. This implies that you are not really interested in winning the discussion, just discrediting the person with whom you are discussing.

Exactly. As his purpose isn't to actually understand the truth, debating with him is a waste of time. I suspect someone very dear to him was born before one of their parents became a citizen, so he regards it as a personal affront to suggest that they are not a "natural" American. He argues from emotion, and with little in the way of reason.

For the record, I’m sincerely disappointed in Mark Levin (and the rest of the conservative commentators). For someone as Constitutionally-knowledgeable as he is supposed to be, his inability to have a civil discussion about natural born citizenship implies there is something else going on that we don’t know about.

I too find it very perplexing that supposedly knowledgeable people intentionally pooh pooh, or avoid any discussion of this subject. The remarkable thing is that two luminaries of the Conservative movement both agree with the underlying premise, but refuse to acknowledge that the theoretical legal foundation which they have laid down in their arguments also encompasses the central tenet of the "birther" argument. Here are George Will and Ann Coulter on the topic of "Anchor Babies."

George Will.

Ann Coulter.

So they both agree with the "birther" argument in principle, but they just cannot bring themselves to admit it.

On a related point, Fox News was poking around a bit in the Obama birth issue, but I have read that the staff received orders directly from Rupert Murdoch to drop it. The assumption was that he was afraid of the Federal response to his ownership of, and threats to FCC licenses possessed by his Fox News corporation. I don't know if this is true, but I do know that i've read a lot of allegations that Rupert Murdoch himself told Roger Ailes to drop this.

133 posted on 10/22/2012 6:27:13 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan
I’m I reading that right. Obama’s great aunt lived at the US miltary base (Pepperrell Air Force Base) in St. John’s Newfoundland, Canada. Had twin children in 1959 who died within a few days of birth in St.John’s but were buried in Wichita, Kansas.

SHE was buried in Wichita Kansas. Her infant sons are buried in Newfoundland Canada.

If it was Pepperrell Air Force Base, that base closed in 1960.

I went back and looked at the links, and I did not see anywhere in there where it mentioned Pepperrell Air Force Base, but I surmise that you are correct none the less. You have produced information of which I had been unaware, and that information tarnishes the theory a bit, though does not destroy it.

Aunt Eleanor was living in Canada in 1959, but according to what you have discovered, she most likely moved elsewhere sometime shortly after that. As it should happen, Radaris used to list several places where she lived, and most of them were in North West Washington State. (Radaris will no longer return any searches on her name. Something has been done to it.)

The information which I had previously gotten from Radaris was that she lived in Blaine Washington. (From other sources I see claims that her Husband went to work for Boeing in the North West Washington area.)

Blaine Washington is right smack dab on the border between Canada and the United States. As it should happen, it shared it's Northern border with the Canadian town of White Rock's Southern Border. They were like twin cities if you will.

Blaine did not have a hospital. White Rock did. If you were having a baby in Blaine, You would need to go to Peace Arch Hospital in White Rock, on the other side of the border.

134 posted on 10/22/2012 6:59:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Eric Pode of Croydon

I found this info on wikipedia, so you can naturally take it with somewhat of a grain of salt, but typically things like this that are easily corrected and relatively non-controversial tend to be pretty accurate on wikipedia. Further, there are several relevant footnotes on this wiki page that might shed some light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born_citizen


135 posted on 10/22/2012 7:48:15 AM PDT by stremba
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

“Her infant sons are buried in Newfoundland Canada.”

Am I reading this wrong?


Wichita Evening Eagle, Thursday, January 15, 1959

Funeral Planned For Twin Boys

The twin sons of Airman 2.C. and. Mrs. Richard [Ralph Lee] Berkebile will be buried here in Calvary Cemetery after graveside services Wednesday. Father Joseph Fisher, All Saints Catholic Church, will officiate. The twins were born Jan. 5, in St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada. Michael Phillip died Monday and Stephan Jerome died on Thursday. They were grandsons of Mr. and Mrs. R. Lee Berkebile, 3920 E. Funston, and Mr. and Mrs. Ralph Dunham, 8635 S. Broadway.

http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GRid=34580925


This is from the Wichita Evening Eagle for January 15, 1959 and it says burial “here in Calvary Cemetery after graveside services Wednesday.” At the bottom of the page it says Calvary Cemetery is in Wichita, Kansas.

I assumed Pepperrell Air Force Base (I should have put a question mark after it) based on the fact the he was an Airman 2 Class and everything was happening in St. John’s where Pepperrell AFB was located.

Frankly, I think you can drop the whole Newfoundland line of inquiry and stick with the Blaine, Washington line.


136 posted on 10/22/2012 8:48:07 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: Puzo1
http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42097.pdf Read it.
137 posted on 10/22/2012 8:49:28 AM PDT by douginthearmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

I missed this in the first line of Eleanor’s find-a-grave article you linked to in post 94.

“Ashes buried near infant twin sons, Stephen and Michael according to family. Married to Ralph Lee Berkebile.”

So definitely the three of them are buried in Wichita, Kansas.

But like I said in previous post I don’t think the Newfoundland info is relevant.


138 posted on 10/22/2012 9:11:21 AM PDT by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

The CRS report has been discredited.


139 posted on 10/22/2012 9:12:04 AM PDT by Ray76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: douginthearmy

I have read the CRS Maskell 2011 memo. He basically says that a “natural born Citizen” is a “born Citizen.” If that is the case, the Founders and Framers would have said so but they did not. Mr. Maskell offers a manipulated and tortured journey through historical sources and case law which does not prove his thesis.


140 posted on 10/22/2012 9:28:45 AM PDT by Puzo1 (Ask the Right Questions to Get the Right Answers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson