The real question is: how many police lieutenants truly believe “we have a warrant” entitles them to intrude on a U.S. Citizen’s residence, even if it is *not* the residence specified on the warrant.
****
Lieutenant Partain of the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office says, “I don’t know if we broke the law, obviously our legal people have to explain that to us.”
Reporter Brett Buffington asks, “You did raid a house with no warrant, though.”
Lieutenant Partain says, “We raided a house with a warrant. We did go to the wrong house.”
Reporter Brett Buffington again asks, “You did raid a house with no warrant.”
Lieutenant Partain says, “We raided a house, we did go there with a warrant, and we did raid the wrong house.”
Reporter Brett Buffington says, “You raided a house with no warrant, you didn’t have a warrant to this house.”
Lieutenant Partain says, “That is true, that is true, that is true.”
Lieutenant Partain says, “That is true, that is true, that is true.”
If that is not a direct violation of the Fourth Amendment then I don't know what is.
All I can say is I await the results of this coming election to see if the American people vote for the rule of law or for its sunset. If it is the latter then this is the flag I will fly...
The real question you didn't answer. May I assume you'll stop exaggerating and being sarcastic?