Magic Numbers!
To: stocksthatgoup
Gallup says Romney up Unemployment down..what to think..... what to think
2 posted on
10/17/2012 6:43:19 PM PDT by
montanajoe
(Blamed Flamed Shamed didn't vote for R/R or O/B)
To: stocksthatgoup
Gallup polls are suspect, especially since Holder threatened to sue them.
4 posted on
10/17/2012 6:46:55 PM PDT by
PMAS
(All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing)
To: stocksthatgoup
"uptick in the number of Americans working part time but looking for full-time work is likely the result of seasonal hiring"BULLSHIT.
Axelrod has put the pressure on these fools, and the reason part-time employment is up (and "un-employment" is down), is because FULL-TIME jobs are harder to find than ever in the past 40 years.
The contorted calculations of Un-Employment is based on NEW CLAIMS, and existing CLAIMS, and because after 99 weeks out of work, you drop off of the list of "Un-employed", and if you take a part time job you drop off the list of "Un-Employed", the numbers are made to make The Messiah look better.
Why do Food Stamps and Welfare rise when un-Employment is dropping?
Common Sense tells us not to trust ANY numbers that the State-Run-Media, or State-Controlled-Polls are spewing.
5 posted on
10/17/2012 6:49:27 PM PDT by
traditional1
(Don't gotsta worry 'bout no mo'gage, don't gotsta worry 'bout no gas; Obama gonna take care o' me!)
To: stocksthatgoup
If another 20M people give up and drop out of the work force, unemployment will really go down.
6 posted on
10/17/2012 6:49:37 PM PDT by
Signalman
To: stocksthatgoup
Yeah, my wife got off the unemployment rolls!
Of course, she's making less than what she was making on unemployment, and making much less than half of what she used to when she got laid off.
But hey, things are sure looking better!
Just shoot me now.
7 posted on
10/17/2012 6:57:55 PM PDT by
Dogbert41
("...The people of Jerusalem are strong, because the Lord Almighty is their God" Zech. 12:5)
To: stocksthatgoup
The government and pollsters can screw with the numbers all they want. A majority of voters ain't buying it anymore. Too much everyday evidence to the contrary.
8 posted on
10/17/2012 7:03:25 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(ObamaCare is an assault on the unborn, infirmed and elderly. GOP, repeat this as necessary...)
To: stocksthatgoup
since when is the rate of unemployment decided by a poll???
10 posted on
10/17/2012 7:16:04 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: stocksthatgoup
Gallup and their polls are a pile of crap.
To: stocksthatgoup
U3 drops a full point in 30 days!
Next thing you know, we’ll hear that the oceans have receded a full foot in the last two weeks.
12 posted on
10/17/2012 7:34:56 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: stocksthatgoup
Now that I think about it, we will likely get an AP story on the morning of Nov. 6th, that the ocean levels have dropped 6’ in the last 12 hours, proving that Obama’s policies are working.
13 posted on
10/17/2012 7:36:52 PM PDT by
SampleMan
(Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
To: stocksthatgoup
So does this mean were are gaining on Greece?
14 posted on
10/17/2012 7:41:25 PM PDT by
Daffynition
(Self-respect: the secure feeling that no one, as yet, is suspicious. ~ HLM)
To: stocksthatgoup
15 posted on
10/17/2012 7:49:21 PM PDT by
WilliamofCarmichael
(If modern America's Man on Horseback is out there, Get on the damn horse already!)
To: stocksthatgoup
I expect unemployment to rise after Obama is defeated. As soon as those that had dropped out of looking for work realize that a new President that actually wants to put people back to work will be inaugurated they will come back in droves and the numbers will reflect a rise in unemployment. I expect also that within a year of President Romney's inauguration the unemployment level will be below 7%.
16 posted on
10/17/2012 7:51:30 PM PDT by
Harley
(Those that don't engage in politics are destined to be governed by inferiors. -Plato)
To: stocksthatgoup
LOL! 7.3. That’s some funny stuff. I think somebody been hittin’ da happy smoke.
17 posted on
10/17/2012 7:58:14 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
(This is America! Being dead is no excuse not to vote!!!)
To: stocksthatgoup
Let’s say you have 1,000 hours of work required per week. That could take 25 employees at 40 hours per week.
But, if you’re faced with catastrophic increases in health care costs for 25 workers who exceed 30 hours per week, why not hire some more employees, say, 15 more. Then, you’d have 40 employees with each working 25 hours per week. That still covers the 1,000 hours of work required per week.
Obama calls it a gain in employment but it’s just a wash and a way around his craziness.
18 posted on
10/17/2012 9:19:53 PM PDT by
Rembrandt
(Part of the 51% who pay Federal taxes)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson