Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: OneWingedShark

That is because you are hysterical.


97 posted on 10/17/2012 9:20:13 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob
That is because you are hysterical.

So you think the founders would have stood such as:
Wickard (establishing that non-commerce is really intrastate commerce is really interstate commerce),
Raich (stripping any pretext of commerce from the authority claimed under the commerce clause),
Kelo (establishing that a 'projection' [for tax] is public use),
Roe (establishing that the States cannot, as mandated by the 14th amendment, protect the lives of its citizens under "equal protection of the laws"),
Lawrence v. Texas (establishing as unconstitutional a [State] anti-sodomy law)?

And you say I'm out of touch? You really are arrogant.
ar·ro·gant - adjective
1. - making claims or pretensions to superior importance or rights; overbearingly assuming; insolently proud: an arrogant public official.
2. - characterized by or proceeding from arrogance: arrogant claims.

99 posted on 10/17/2012 9:41:50 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson