Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dead Corpse

Oh, please. You think Kings did not take resources from those who earned them to use for his own purposes? That is in no way socialism either.

As long as there has been organized society there has been welfare or one sort or another. You think 19th century England was socialist?

Learn a little about ancient Athens. Or Rome. Neither of them were socialist.


90 posted on 10/17/2012 8:28:55 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: arrogantsob
Monarchism is different that Socialism.

Not a surprise that you are grasping at every possible straw to support your idiocy.

Ancient Greece had Kings. The early beginnings of Democracy as well, but the King was still the King. In Lacedaemonia, they actually had Two Kings.

The Founders had a rather famous debate in the first Congress over setting up a pension fund for an Admiral's widow. The idea of the FedGov provided individual welfare was resoundingly rejected.

Makes you a liar. Again.

100 posted on 10/18/2012 5:38:26 AM PDT by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson