Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: arrogantsob
We have a gigantic government because that is what the People thought they wanted and they had the votes to create it. Democracy will overrule proper policy on many occasions.

So then you agree that we're more a democracy than anything else?

Given that admission, and the fact that failure to pay taxes [particularly property] results in the government taking property (and therefore is not really your property, but 'on loan' from the government) -- Would it be utterly inaccurate to say the current state is also socialist in nature?

79 posted on 10/17/2012 6:11:36 PM PDT by OneWingedShark (Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: OneWingedShark

With the removal of Senatorial appointment by the states we took a big step towards democracy, same is true with the continual expansion of the electorate. Should the Electoral College be removed or effectively circumvented we would be pretty much a democracy.

Government has always taxed property and always will, that has nothing to do with socialism in which you would have NO private property at all. Even without government you hold property only conditionally. In fact, you hold it more tenuously without government.


80 posted on 10/17/2012 6:16:58 PM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson