To: DonaldC
For that price range, I would find a laptop more useful, but that is me.It's not a full laptop substitute, but that's the trade-off - 2 lbs of hardware vs the 6 lbs for the average laptop in exchange for decreased capabilities. Besides, the Surface isn't competing with laptops - it's competing with the Ipad and the various Android clones. The problem for Microsoft has been the proliferation of tablets that are now hogging device market share that used to go to PC's. Microsoft doesn't need to make a tablet, but it needs to have its partners make tablets based on a Microsoft OS and Office. The Surface is its entry into this new market.
4 posted on
10/16/2012 3:16:41 PM PDT by
Zhang Fei
(Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
To: Zhang Fei
It's not a full laptop substitute, but that's the trade-off - 2 lbs of hardware vs the 6 lbs for the average laptop in exchange for decreased capabilities. Besides, the Surface isn't competing with laptops - it's competing with the Ipad and the various Android clones. The problem for Microsoft has been the proliferation of tablets that are now hogging device market share that used to go to PC's. Microsoft doesn't need to make a tablet, but it needs to have its partners make tablets based on a Microsoft OS and Office. The Surface is its entry into this new market. It worked for Microsoft before. It brokered DOS to the IBM PC entry, which became the enterprise acceptable machine in 1980.
Own the enterprise space and the consumer space will follow.
Apple works the other way around.
6 posted on
10/16/2012 3:38:30 PM PDT by
cicero2k
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson