Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DonaldC
For that price range, I would find a laptop more useful, but that is me.

It's not a full laptop substitute, but that's the trade-off - 2 lbs of hardware vs the 6 lbs for the average laptop in exchange for decreased capabilities. Besides, the Surface isn't competing with laptops - it's competing with the Ipad and the various Android clones. The problem for Microsoft has been the proliferation of tablets that are now hogging device market share that used to go to PC's. Microsoft doesn't need to make a tablet, but it needs to have its partners make tablets based on a Microsoft OS and Office. The Surface is its entry into this new market.

4 posted on 10/16/2012 3:16:41 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Zhang Fei
It's not a full laptop substitute, but that's the trade-off - 2 lbs of hardware vs the 6 lbs for the average laptop in exchange for decreased capabilities. Besides, the Surface isn't competing with laptops - it's competing with the Ipad and the various Android clones. The problem for Microsoft has been the proliferation of tablets that are now hogging device market share that used to go to PC's. Microsoft doesn't need to make a tablet, but it needs to have its partners make tablets based on a Microsoft OS and Office. The Surface is its entry into this new market.

It worked for Microsoft before. It brokered DOS to the IBM PC entry, which became the enterprise acceptable machine in 1980.

Own the enterprise space and the consumer space will follow.

Apple works the other way around.

6 posted on 10/16/2012 3:38:30 PM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson