You thought I was an adult conversation? Maybe you have been drinking an adult beverage.
You haven't clearly stated anything in days
I don't know how to type slower so you can understand better.
CW: what I was writing in that response is based on your own belief in what the woman said.: Are you a mind reader???
What I was writing in that response is based on whether or not you believe what the woman said; i.e. your "belief", or lack thereof, in what the woman said will inform whether you would find that she was a conspirator, a drug dealer, and a cheat. I wouldn't try to read your mind -- although it does amaze me that after all the exchanges, you would suggest that you do NOT believe what the woman said.
If you don't believe the woman, you should probably say so, and explain why. If you DO believe the woman, you probably shouldn't object to someone suggesting you believe her, even though you were mistaken in that conclusion.
CW: "All we know is that she CLAIMS that, when offered money, she then stopped being a conspirator, and started telling the truth." : Can you show me that lie in the article???
If you think she was lying there, that is your opinion, not something I stated. However, here again is the quote from the article, since apparently you have a short memory:
Ms. O’Reilly first went public in 2003, when she was paid to cooperate on a book,However, to give you a bit of credit, the article didn't explicitly CLAIM that she stopped being a conspirator when she sold her story to the book. I would however assume she did, since the team would hardly allow her to continue after that. Remember, this is based on whether you believe her or not -- I'm not saying that she is telling the truth, and there may not have been any conspiracy for her to stop being a part of.
Again to summarize what this woman CLAIMS: She carried illegal drugs across international borders. She disposed of drugs to hide them from investigators. She used her skills to hide evidence of drug use. She gave out prescription medication without a license. She knew virtually from when she started working that she was part of a cheating organization, and did nothing to stop the cheating, or to report the cheating, and instead aided and abetted that cheating, until someone offered her money to sell her story.
I won't say that this is the woman you choose to believe, because you seem to be confused on that point. When you figure out if you believe her or not, let us know.
So then this statement is true and your statement was the lie.
Thanks for the admission.