Can you point that out in the article???
Note that I am not directly accusing her of these things
Oh no?? Sure could have fooled me. You wrote:
"The girl in this story apparently lied, cheated, and participated in the drug trade for years."
If that 's not an accusation then I don't know what is???
She participated in the drug trade. She helped hide the evidence, thus cheating. She actually distributed prescription drugs, and since she isn't a pharmacist, that could well be a criminal violation.
She was doing all of this for the USPS team of Lance Armstrong. LOL
So she was an international drug trafficker.
Yeh -- for the USPS team of Lance Armstrong. LOL
She was intimately involved in the drug use cover-up, perpetuating the lies by hiding the evidence.
Yeh -- for the USPS team of Lance Armstrong. LOL
She finally told the truth, by her words, only when someone PAID her to do so.
But she told the truth, right???
But just so others aren't confused by your infantile response.
The word "apparently" is not a placeholder. It has an actual meaning, and a purpose. In this case, the purpose was to denote that things might not be as they seem.
And as I clearly stated in my second response to you, what I was writing in that response is based on your own belief in what the woman said. As my argument is that we cannot know if she is truthful now or not, I can't accuse her of doing things based on what she said, I can only point out what SHE is accusing HERSELF of.
You seem to then think that, because her claims were that she cheated, lied, and broke the rules, and engaged in possibly illegal drug trafficking FOR the U.S. postal service, that this somehow means that this isn't part of her own character.
Then you bizarrely claim that, because SHE says she finally told the truth, that this means that she finally told the truth. In fact, we can't KNOW whether she told the truth later -- all we know is that she was doing things for money, and then people offered her money to say things, and she said them.
But she told the truth, right??
She SAID she told the truth. Lance says he told the truth. Unless you are a mind reader, you would have to leap to a conclusion to assert that she told the truth. All we know is that she CLAIMS that, when offered money, she then stopped being a conspirator, and started telling the truth.
Oh no?? Sure could have fooled me
Of that, I am certain, but I would take no pride in it, as it would not seem to be a hard thing to do.