Replies

It is irresponsible, exploitative business.

They are sending out signals hoping for someone unstable enough to disrupt the nations presidential debate on national television to score profits.

This is an anti-American stunt, for corporate profits.

As a supposed conservative, you know that money isn’t everything, and that patriotism and America matters more, you may even be able to realize that if this had happened in the first debate, it may have diluted the massive political effect of the debate on the public and in changing the polls.

Welcome to freerepublic.

You raise a good point regarding if this had happened in the first debate. But at the same time, stupid questions always come up during the townhall-style debate, eg whats your favorite color, what will you do to help ME pay for my cable, etc. At least this question has some business calculations behind it, and if asked it is unlikely to have the effect that it would have had in the first debate.

Because this type of debate (at this level) is practically geared towards inane questions.