Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: a fool in paradise
Some of them made false accusations of others while under oath.

True. However, they were trying to escape death themselves.

The prosecutors would allow a confession with evidence of repentance as reason for allowing the person to be released. Refusal to confess was taken as evidence of guilt.

Evidence of repentance essentially required accusation of others.

Making such accusations was a wicked thing to do, but a very human failing when in fear of death. The primarily responsible parties are those who put the "witches" in this position.

We should also remember the heroic Giles Corey, who not only refused to accuse others, but refused to plead guilty or not guilty. He was therefore "pressed" to death, crushed under a pile of stones. This meant his family inherited his property, which would have been confiscated if he was convicted.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giles_Corey

In a truly classic example of "F U," his last words were "more rocks."

24 posted on 10/06/2012 1:06:50 PM PDT by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

The Crucible was a work of fiction/propaganda. The false accusations by those already charged (and guilty of being witches in the book) were supposed to make Americans skeptical of those named by known Communists.


26 posted on 10/06/2012 1:13:42 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Obama likes to claim credit for getting Osama. Why hasn't he tried Khalid Sheikh Mohammed yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson