Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: massmike
They argue the father “failed to give a valid reason” for refusing to give up his parental rights so that the lesbian partner can replace him.

After all, children are merely chattel, owned by the mother, created for the sole purpose of satisfying the mother's emotional needs. And the father's role is also perfectly clear: he should pay for everything, but should have no contact with the mother or children.

8 posted on 10/01/2012 9:53:43 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TChad

“’failed to give a valid reason’ for refusing to give up his parental rights”

Um, if they are rights he doesn’t have to have a reason. Unless “rights” mean something different over there, like “temporary claim to be revoked should your wife have sex with someone else who wants in.”


13 posted on 10/01/2012 11:51:34 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson