Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: MacMattico
The clearly stated intent of the artist was given in a written artists statement presented before the work was displayed. This is standard procedure. Did he give other possible interpretations? Yes he did. So do I. “Versatility” and “multivalent” are keywords to having your work shown. Over literalism and single line of interpretation work is generally scrapped as uninteresting.

I didn't trot out Sister Wendy to appease Catholics. I'm a fan of her meditations and spirituality so i reached for her interpretation. There are dozens of other highly religious critics that have tackled it if you consider hers substandard because she started public criticism late in life.

As well - you says it's a literal act with specific meaning. He literally did not urinate on it. The urine was carefully collected and lit a very specific way in an attempt to look beautiful. See above about literalism and single avenue interpretations.

30 posted on 09/28/2012 7:25:31 AM PDT by texanred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: texanred

“... The urine was carefully collected.” Please... Enough already...


32 posted on 09/28/2012 6:14:11 PM PDT by MacMattico
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson