To: D-fendr
Yes, of course. I could strike-out on purpose FAIL. There are only two outcomes to an at-bat (get on base or don't) but more than two candidates. You should get better at this "reason" stuff before you presume to lecture others about it.
238 posted on
09/28/2012 10:05:20 AM PDT by
JustSayNoToNannies
(A free society's default policy: it's none of government's business.)
To: D-fendr
Yeah, you should know that, since real verification is no longer necessary, the number of candidates is only limited by the number of people on Earth who can reasonably pass the age requirement for president
239 posted on
09/28/2012 10:11:31 AM PDT by
Hegewisch Dupa
(Vote for Goode, end up with evil, pat self on back repeatedly)
To: JustSayNoToNannies
The point of the analogy was that it requires the batter to:
Assume his at bat doesn’t matter, and/or:
Believe his sending a message is more important than the outcome of the game.
It also assumes message integrity - that the message desired is the message received.
The message I get is that those who consider voting for Virgil either haven’t thought it through or don’t care if Obama wins.
240 posted on
09/28/2012 10:13:20 AM PDT by
D-fendr
(Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson