http://aboutmittromney.com/abortion.htm
“As for the claim that Romney signed government mandated health care with taxpayer-funded abortions, that, too, is overblown. The state health care law didnt say anything about abortion. Instead, the state exchange later decided that subsidized insurance plans would include coverage for abortion. And the exchange may have had little choice but to do so. In 1981, the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled that women eligible for Medicaid had a state constitutional right to payments for medically necessary abortions. In 1997, the state high court again ruled that Massachusetts must cover medically necessary abortions if it covers other medically necessary care, such as childbirth...
But its not true that he signed a law that included taxpayer-funded abortions.
The Gingrich Web video says that Romney used taxpayers funds to pay for abortions. Again, the law didnt say anything about abortion. Were taxpayer funds ever actually used to cover abortions for those who gained subsidized coverage under the law? We asked the Gingrich campaign if it had any proof for that claim. So far, we have not received a response. But overall, the law didnt lead to any increase in abortions in the state. In fact, both the number and rate of abortions have declined since the legislation was passed.
The Guttmacher Institute, whose research on abortion has been cited by both political parties, has compiled statistics that show the number of abortions in the state went from 27,270 in 2005, the year before the law was passed, to 24,900 in 2008, the most recent statistic available. And the rate of abortions per 1,000 women of reproductive age fell from 19.9 in 2005 to 18.3 in 2008. Thats an 8 percent drop, compared with a small rise of 1 percent nationally.
Looks like Jim had it right.