Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: djf
Jennings satisfied everything in Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, yet nothing applied to Jennings in Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3, Item 5.

Golden Tate didn't satisfy anything in either Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3 and Rule 8, Section 1, Article 3(5).

This is absurd.

"Peter King, Sports Illustrated... The inability to recognize the difference between simultaneous possession and one receiver trying to steal the ball from a defender. [...] The most telling part of the replay, if you watch closely, is that Tate's right arm, as the pile of bodies fall to the turf, flails out for a moment when Jennings has the ball, and then Tate puts his arm back in the scrum. Easley should have been able to see that."

27 posted on 09/25/2012 11:07:15 AM PDT by The KG9 Kid (Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The KG9 Kid

[...] The most telling part of the replay, if you watch closely, is that Tate’s right arm, as the pile of bodies fall to the turf, flails out for a moment when Jennings has the ball, and then Tate puts his arm back in the scrum. Easley should have been able to see that.”
____________________________________________________________

Depends what your definition of “is” is.


32 posted on 09/25/2012 11:13:17 AM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson