Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va

Except the lesson is you can’t. Texas v. White resolved the legal issues, holding that the 1861-1865 pretended secession was of no legal effect, and that putting down the insurrection was correct. Further, it held that money loaned to support the insurrection should not be paid back by the States.

So you are pretty much wrong on all counts. Rather like saying you can rob a bank and shoot a guard with no penalty, and lets just pretend that getting caught, put on trial and executed part doesn’t count.


72 posted on 09/24/2012 5:39:16 PM PDT by donmeaker (Blunderbuss: A short weapon, ... now superceded in civilized countries by more advanced weaponry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: donmeaker
Except the lesson is you can’t. Texas v. White resolved the legal issues, holding that the 1861-1865 pretended secession was of no legal effect, and that putting down the insurrection was correct. Further, it held that money loaned to support the insurrection should not be paid back by the States.

You have a rather simplistic view of things. Both sides were hypocrites. At the beginning, the South said "We Secede." The North said "You can't secede." When the war was over, the South said, "Okay, since we can't secede, we will send our Representatives and Senators back to Congress. The North said "No. You Seceded. "

Did they secede, or didn't they? I guess when the US wanted to regard them as having seceded, they did, and when it wanted to regard them as not having seceded, they did that as well.

80 posted on 09/24/2012 7:09:05 PM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson