Replies

Um, I don’t think the New York Times supports the business class. Nor does Obama.

So what does that have to do with the London Times in 1863?

And I would say today that the NY Times and just about all of the mainstream media side with the biggest business in the US. Not Apple or Microsoft or General Electric --- they are small businesses.

There is only one Big Business and that is this thoroughly corrupt Federal Government we have today. $4 Trillion year -- and GROWING!

NT Times... London Times... 150 years difference... textiles --- corrupt government... big money... what's the freaking difference?

Money is money and people are people. 150 years does not change that.

[me]: Um, I don’t think the New York Times supports the business class. Nor does Obama.

[you]: So what does that have to do with the London Times in 1863?

I was responding to your argument that the London Spectator supported the business class. You strangely likened them (the London Spectator and the business class) to the New York Times and Obama. I couldn't make the connection.

NT Times... London Times... 150 years difference... textiles --- corrupt government... big money... what's the freaking difference?

I'm still having trouble understanding your argument. The New York Times is losing money [Link]. Apparently though, you and I both depreciate corrupt government. On that we agree.