I assume you did so because I repeatedly stated yesterday that, just as FReepers advised with the beginning of the Zimmerman case, we should take caution to wait until the facts come in before drawing conclusions.
If the contents of this anonymous internet comment are true, you've added some excellent information that's damning.
Have you been able to substantiate any of this? I've tried, but haven't found anything in any article, any police statement, any eyewitness statement (well, the driblets in the press), or anywhere else.
As long as anonymous internet comments are being put on the table, should we throw into the mix the one contained in the story you posted yesterday, where a guy says he's known the victim since high school and says the victim 'wasn't a nice guy' and "got into altercations"?
Let's keep following this to see what additional facts come forward (and I guess, if you want, additional anonymous internet comments). I want to know what the cameras show, what the eyewitnesses actually said, and the circumstances of that second shot. Like you, I only see one bullet hole in the windows - and the victim had two bullet holes in his chest. I don't see how the best $10 lawyer in Ponca City can explain that to me.
"No where did it mention that she actually missed with the first shot, but she did chase the young man away with that shot."
The shot through the window appears to have angled into the metal surrounding the window. It's hard to imagine how that could have hit him from the angle of it??
So there were probably three shots. The first one inside the car was probably muzzled and no one heard it. The two outside spaced so close together that they sounded like one to the witnesses.