Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tar and Feathers

Except the polls were pretty darn accurate in 2008 and that is what has some of us more than a little jittery this time around.


9 posted on 09/21/2012 11:59:34 AM PDT by tatown ( FUMD, FUAC, and FUGB)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: tatown

The polls were accurate because they saw a massive groundswell of Obamamania and gave him a +8 advantage with polling, which was correct. To still be giving him such an advantage today is borderline ridiculous.


13 posted on 09/21/2012 12:11:05 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: tatown
Except the polls were pretty darn accurate in 2008 and that is what has some of us more than a little jittery this time around.

SOME polls were accurate.

The polls by professional polling houses (Gallup, Rasmussen, ARG, SurveyUSA, etc.) showed a steady Obama lead for a month leading into the election. They were largely correct. MSM polls showed Obama with unsupportably huge leads (10-15%, when he actually only won by 7. These usually overstated Obama's support, and for much the same reason as they are today - messed up internal demographics and unrealistic partisan ID breakdowns.

18 posted on 09/21/2012 12:31:01 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (You can wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which gets filled first.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson