But the prosecution has set the standard here. They have released everything they could, accidentally and on purpose, that is negative about GZ.
Doesn't the defense get to use the same standard or are they supposed to be left defenseless in the face of the prosecution's laffidavits and selective evidence releases.
All that we have heard from the prosecution is how innocent and holy and saintly and unselfish this future airline pilot was, but when asked for evidence of such they can't produce it. When the defense goes in search of such evidence the prosecution cries foul.
Why don't they start by publishing the pictures of Trayvon as the 17 year old that he was instead of posting all of his baby pictures. It was a 6'2" 17 year old teenager that assaulted GZ that night not a 12 year old child. How about starting there.
Actually, no. One is an adult, one was a child.
Zimmerman’s credibility is the key to his defense. He lacks credibility yet pointing out specifics is a 'no-no' here where his supporters take his word as gospel.
This is a discussion site and that’s the reason I’m here. Any thread gets really boring when everyone agrees and just posts the same thing over and over again --- fight-club video, gold-toothed thug, pot-smoking gangsta-wannabe --- with never any dissention, questions, or disagreement allowed.
Trayvon was suspicious because he ran, Trayvon was suspicious because he didn't run fast enough, Trayvon should have run all the way home, Trayvon had no business even being on that property, Trayvon shouldn't have been allowed to go to the store, Trayvon shouldn't have been allowed to have a phone --- there’s no reason to keep reading threads where everyone believes the same way.
If I disagree, post respectfully, make valid points, or ask valid questions, everyone panics, rushes to push the abuse button to have my post removed, and calls me names.
Bullies, ya are --- just like your hero.