Didn't think you were, but I was/am curious about your reasoning.
if you could help me find the original threads
No luck, sorry.
An earlier thread on this story detailed injuries to the dog’s paws that made it reportedly impossible to bring him down by the owners at the time (or so they said—yeah, I’m skeptical too). And the original owners were depicted as trying harder to rescue their dog than is being depicted in this over-simplified final story prosecution.
I don’t doubt that the dog is in absolutely fantastic hands in the ownership of the eventual rescuers, but I just want to make sure that the fact that the original owners lost ownership of their dog as the result of legal prosecution is really something to feel good about.
With all the miserable news lately, this is a wonderful bright spot.
Brought a smile to our faces.
That, and H Buzzard’s post. :D