Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Irish Eyes; KansasGirl

Who is worse, McCaskill or whatever her name is, or Aikin? It’s really simple.


56 posted on 09/16/2012 2:32:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: little jeremiah
[ Who is worse, McCaskill or whatever her name is, or Aikin? It’s really simple. ]

Of course, McCaskill is worse. Doesn't change the fact that Akin has made himself absolutely unelectable.. One has to wonder, why does Akin want to guarantee McCaskill the shrew's re-election?

63 posted on 09/16/2012 2:47:30 PM PDT by KansasGirl ("If you have a business, you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."--B. Hussein Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah

They both are ... for different reasons

We do not have to choose between wrong and stupid.
We can do better than that.


78 posted on 09/16/2012 3:39:51 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: little jeremiah
Who is worse, McCaskill or whatever her name is, or Aikin? It’s really simple.

Just as it's simple to choose between Obama and Romney. Romney was among the last few people who I would have chosen from the field of GOP candidates, but he is many miles ahead of Obama in every respect other than his false religion, and considering Obama's choice of an apostate, Islam-honoring "Christian" church for his religious home, IMHO Obama and Romney probably rate about even on that issue. If I lived in MO I would now want Akin to drop out and I would then support another strong pro-life Pub who doesn't share Akin's politically suicidal baggage. But that's not because of Akins stance on abortion, but simply because he has shot himself in his political foot with his inept attempt to appeal to MO's pro-life voters.

Never the less, any pro-life Pub candidate is vastly preferable to any and all possible Dem candidates for the open MO seat. That's primarily due to overall GOP support for the pro-life cause, which along with many other worthy "causes" is now virtually non-existent in the almost totally Godless/socialist Dem party. There's actually no clear-cut black vs white dividing line between the 2 parties on that vitally important issue, but the line is certainly more than clear enough to rule out any Christian's vote for any possible Dem candidate for that critically important Senate seat in which a Pub Senator could deep 6 Obama's upcoming attempt to remake the US into another Euro style socialist/Marxist/atheist state. Of course that's assuming Obama wins a 2nd term, a tragic possibility which at this stage of the contest appears to be slightly more likely than not depending on what poll, if any, for which you have at least a bare modicum of trust.

150 posted on 09/16/2012 9:51:41 PM PDT by epow (I stand redeemed by the blood of the lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson