You need to reference the actual book...however most of those quote do indeed. Sounds accurate and make good sense. And when Roy was speaking about voices..those are the demonic which actuallu do talk to people. You should know that...and there is a multitude of teaching and good things that are not in the bible..so what! That is a ridiculous arguement and demostarive of your fixation and root base of faith in a written book. A good book indeed but onlt a representation of some great people of faith.
Although there are details that Roy speaks of that is not in the bible, there also is zero about him that is opposed to the biblical principles. And this is why you are indeed a liar and a character assasin. All that Roy puts forth is OBVIOUSLY. Commonsense and helping so so many people. Instead of being gracious and conceding that, you simple continue to villify him as some cultish new age guy. Well, all I can say is good luck because you need it. I know you have not real freedom...only learn salvation...not authentic or you would easily see the kind and very decent nature being expressed by Roy. Have a good one!
The actual book has been clearly referenced. You just need to paste it into the address bar on your browser and lot thru it. Choose search and search texts in the quotes and you will find them. And all, not some, are there, including the one you relegated to being new age and others which you denied, but being documented you must now affirm them. .
And when Roy was speaking about voices..those are the demonic
No, the reference i gave about words being spoken, that "Sometimes you will hear, quite distinctly, words "spoken" to you in short phrases. Do not be alarmed, (p. 42) is not of demons, at least according to Masters, so after judging previous words to be new age now you judge these to be of demons. But which is more accurate.
Although there are details that Roy speaks of that is not in the bible, there also is zero about him that is opposed to the biblical principles. And this is why you are indeed a liar and a character assasin.
Rather, your basis for judgment is your own esoteric "understanding" which needs not allow anything to contradict it, while i have abudantly done so here, which others can freely now see.
see the kind and very decent nature being expressed by Roy.>
This is certainly not what you have exampled, even in response to documented proof and careful exegesis, and your unreasonable demands for physical books, etc., and implacable response, and overall desperate attempts to defend Masters, to the point where you deny documented statements as being by him, and still calling one who supplies them a liars, that even being contrary to forum rules, which you express disregard for, continues to be an argument against Masters no matter how much you promote him as you seem driven to do. And which has resulted in him being increasingly exposed for what he is.