Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Listen bud, there's no second term nothing and they know as much,"
hillbuzz.org ^ | September 13, 2012 | Kevin DuJan

Posted on 09/15/2012 6:05:10 PM PDT by virgil283

Listen bud, there’s no second term nothing and they know as much,” a Think Squader told me between bites of his bodacious sandwich. “All this is for show. Axelrod has already moved on but no one knows what to do and they’re kind of just limping around without a plan hoping those Romney people mess up or the media drags them across the finish line. But ain’t nobody in that top tier who thinks he’s going to win. It’s just not happening because they can’t fool people a second time”. I know there are many of you who — for whatever reason — still sit in front of your televisions with your eyes pried wide open taking in all the lies the corrupt media tells you. Why you do this is beyond me. I also don’t understand why you still pay for newspaper subscriptions or think that the polls Chris Matthews and Rachel Maddow recite to you are in any way accurate. I can find no gentle way to stay this but if you believe what the tee-vee tells you, then you’re foolish. After four long years of watching the corrupt media relentlessly lie to drag Obama over the finish line if you have not picked up on the fact that everyone on television is working hard under the Democrats’ banner then there is truly something wrong with you. You are a lost cause...

(Excerpt) Read more at hillbuzz.org ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last
To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Nate Silver? Who said in 2010 that he thought the Dems would hold the House? LOL!

Huh? Here's an article from Aug. of 2009 where he was suggesting "major gains for the GOP" from US News. Nate Silver sees major gains for GOP in 2010

His model does a lot more than simply average polls, that's what RCP does, but even that is pretty accurate.

Here is the paper on poll accuracy I mentioned in my previous posting: Poll Accuracy in 2008 Presidential Election

Please feel free to post som links, LOL.

41 posted on 09/17/2012 1:21:46 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: ReaganÃœberAlles
Nate Silver? Who said in 2010 that he thought the Dems would hold the House? LOL!

Huh? Here's an article from Aug. of 2009 where he was suggesting "major gains for the GOP" from US News. Nate Silver sees major gains for GOP in 2010

His model does a lot more than simply average polls, that's what RCP does, but even that is pretty accurate.

Here is the paper on poll accuracy I mentioned in my previous posting: Poll Accuracy in 2008 Presidential Election

Please feel free to post some links, LOL.

42 posted on 09/17/2012 1:21:57 AM PDT by Jack Black ( Whatever is left of American patriotism is now identical with counter-revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

Averaging polls is completely unreliable.

Silver thought that the Rats would hold the House.

Silver’s a Left wing traitor


43 posted on 09/17/2012 6:16:02 AM PDT by ReaganÜberAlles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson