And why aren't Americans angry that we traded 3000 our citizens for 3 Saudi Royal princes?
To: Ben Barrack
I always felt that Saudi Arabia and Eqypt needed leveling after 9/11. the murderers were from there and they were praised by a good chunk of the populous and the leaders there.
2 posted on
09/11/2012 8:30:22 AM PDT by
Vaquero
(Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
To: Ben Barrack
And why aren't Americans angry that we traded 3000 our citizens for 3 Saudi Royal princes?
Maybe because they would prefer a more reliable source than a blogger ... named Walid Shoebat no less.
3 posted on
09/11/2012 8:31:06 AM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
To: Ben Barrack
5 posted on
09/11/2012 8:39:43 AM PDT by
Morgana
(-----------> Eat at Chick-Fil-A <-----------)
To: Ben Barrack
I am sick and tired of all this BUSH blaming.
BILL CLINTON has more responsibility and BLAME than anyone, he did NOTHING about Osama when he had the chance. Perhaps he desired to leave HIS problems to the next President, knowing that one would take all the BLAME for him, that's democrat politics for you.
Stop with the woulda, coulda, shouda stuff about BUSH. Try that same woulda, coulda, shouda against Slick Willie and his ILK.
6 posted on
09/11/2012 8:40:15 AM PDT by
annieokie
To: Ben Barrack
No question that the chief movers behind 9/11 were the Saudis.
Saddam Hussein also played a part in it, and I had no quarrel with the invasion if Iraq. But I assumed—wrongly—that Bush would follow through, and would deal with the Saudis after he had secured the Iraqi oil supply.
Instead, he pulled his punches in Iraq after the successful invasion, dragged it out, and did nothing about the Saudis. Bush and his father were good pals of the Saudi sheikhs, and evidently that outweighed their obligation to defend our country from its enemies.
The momentum was lost, and by the time Obama came in, Iraq was a churning mess with little gain from our military victories. And the Saudis still run the show. No wonder Obama bows down to them—although for different reasons than Bush.
7 posted on
09/11/2012 8:41:35 AM PDT by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: Ben Barrack
We needed someone to go back and run the Muslim Brotherhood, so we could help them form their empire.
8 posted on
09/11/2012 8:42:02 AM PDT by
pallis
To: Ben Barrack
So even though OBL said it was his operation, his idea and he coordinated the whole thing, that was a ruse?
9 posted on
09/11/2012 8:44:16 AM PDT by
svcw
(If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
To: Ben Barrack
I find this post offensive.
10 posted on
09/11/2012 8:44:39 AM PDT by
faucetman
( Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
To: Ben Barrack
Conspiracy theories about 9/11 are in abundance...
Might as well stop reading there.
12 posted on
09/11/2012 8:49:00 AM PDT by
McGruff
(Support your local Republican candidates. They are our last line of defense.)
To: Ben Barrack
Saudi Arabia and Pakistan are not our friends. We must recognize that.
15 posted on
09/11/2012 8:55:13 AM PDT by
PGR88
To: Ben Barrack
If Osama bin Lauden and his ikl had their way - the house of Saud would be the first lined up against the wall to be executed.
Making war on Saudi Arabia after 9-11 would make about as much sense as prosecuting the Hearst family for the bank robbery her (kidnapped) daughter engaged in.
18 posted on
09/11/2012 9:02:37 AM PDT by
allmendream
(Tea Party did not send GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism)
To: Ben Barrack
IF U SEZ SO
To: Ben Barrack
40 posted on
09/11/2012 10:44:10 AM PDT by
rawcatslyentist
(I'd rather have a bottle in front of me, than a Barack 0b0tt0my!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson